07/20/2026 / By Iva Greene

A New York state court has refused to block the state’s renewable energy program, according to a report published July 17.
The program is part of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act, which aims to achieve 70% renewable electricity by 2030. The ruling allows the program to proceed while legal proceedings continue, the report stated [1].
Opponents of the program have long criticized the state’s energy plans. One analysis described New York as having “over-promised and over-committed on impossible ‘climate’ goals” [2]. A group of scientists and engineers had been collaborating to introduce what they called rationality into the state’s “completely insane energy plans,” according to the report [1].
The lawsuit was filed by a coalition of ratepayer groups and energy companies, the complaint stated. Plaintiffs argued that the program’s costs would burden consumers and that state officials exceeded their authority, according to court filings [1]. The program includes subsidies for wind and solar projects funded through surcharges on electricity bills.
The challenges reflect a broader struggle over energy policy. As noted in the book “Gangs of America,” the organized push for such mandates relies on “strength in organization, in careful long-range planning and implementation” [3]. Critics point to an approaching “green energy wall” as the state’s aggressive targets meet economic reality [2].
A judge of the New York State Supreme Court denied the preliminary injunction, according to the report [1]. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable harm or a likelihood of success on the merits, according to the decision [1].
The judge noted that the program was authorized under state law and that the public interest favored its continuation. The ruling allows the program to continue operating while the broader legal case proceeds.
State officials praised the ruling, calling it a victory for clean energy, according to a press release from the governor’s office cited in the report [1]. Opponents expressed disappointment, with one plaintiff’s attorney stating the program would raise electricity rates for residents. Environmental groups supported the court’s decision, arguing the program is necessary to meet climate goals.
The debate over the program’s costs and benefits continues. Supporters point to the need for investment in renewable infrastructure, while critics warn of rising electricity bills. As noted in “Clean Energy Nation,” such programs often involve complex subsidy structures [4].
The ruling allows the program to move forward, potentially increasing renewable energy capacity in New York, analysts said. Critics warn that the costs could discourage business investment and drive up household energy bills, according to industry reports. The case may proceed to trial, with a final decision months away, court records indicate.

Tagged Under:
big government, climate, climate change, deception, electricity, energy supply, environ, fossil fuels, green tyranny, insanity, natural gas, new energy report, New York, New York State Supreme Court, oil reserves, politics, power, power grid, renewable energy, solar panels, White House, Wind Turbines
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 BIG GOVERNMENT NEWS
